• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

561-693-2648 · CONTACT

VirtuallyIncredible.com

VirtuallyIncredible.com

Helping Property Managers Earn More Do Less Live Life

  • Our Services
    • Phone Tenders Call Center
    • Virtual Assistant
    • Video SEO Services
    • FREE Local SEO Report
    • Outsourcing Assessment
    • PCR Transcription
    • Mystery Shopping
  • FREE Video Training
    • 360 Video Training
    • How to Shoot Real Estate Video Walkthrough Tours
    • How to Shoot Property Condition Videos (USA)
    • How to Shoot Property Condition Report Videos (AUSTRALIA)
    • Become a Certified Internet Videographer
    • CIV Designation
  • Happy Customers
  • Learn More
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Meet the Leadership Team
    • Charities We Support
    • Blog
  • Careers
    • Careers Hub
    • Why work with us?
    • Staff Events

“Emotional Support” Pit Bull Dispute Costs Landlord $35,000

August 1, 2018 By Todd Breen

landlord court case“A landlord may not penalize tenants for the presence of an assistance animal by imposing fees or insurance requirements solely because of the animal’s breed or size,” department Director Kevin Kish said in a news release.

In 2016 a lawsuit was filed on behalf of a tenant and his wife in which they accused their former landlord of discrimination based on their emotional support pit bull. Claims are still disputed by the landlord.

Under the settlement agreement, Kurian and his company, Goodman Villas IV, must:

  • Pay the tenants $20,000
  • Pay $10,000 in attorney fees and costs to the state agency
  • Pay $5,000 to Greater Bakersfield Legal Assistance, which provided legal assistance to the tenants
  • Required to attain training for himself and his property managers on fair housing laws
  • Must put into place an anti-discrimination policy
  • Must post certain educational materials at his properties.

The story according to the lawsuit:
The tenants had two emotional support dogs, a pit bull and a Pomeranian, when they moved into their apartment northeast Bakersfield in January 2015.

Four months later, the landlord allegedly told the tenants that his liability insurance would not cover any dog weighing more than 20 pounds, so the pit bull could not stay.

The tenants purchased a $100,000 insurance policy covering the dogs, but the landlord told them they needed a $1 million policy to cover the pit bull. The tenants were served an eviction notice that would only be rescinded only if the couple got rid of the pit bull, despite the tenants having medical documentation that both dogs were support animals.

The landlord argues that the tenants had 3 dogs, and the pit bull was not one of the support dogs but instead a pet belonging to one of the tenants’ aunts. There was also growing concern over the pit bull after complaints from other tenants in the complex said it was chasing people including a small child.

“I’m concerned about the safety of the other tenants,” Kurian said, adding that he was not in favor of settling the case but that his insurer insisted.

How do you limit your risk?

To limit risk of this happening to you, we recommend Petscreening.com to all managers.

Join NARPM Copyright © 2020 Home Property Management II, Inc Outsourcing department: VirtuallyinCredible
8259 N Military Trl #1, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410

(561) 693-2648 · Privacy Policy
Terms and Conditions · Returns · Cancellations · Testimonial Policy